Monday, June 9, 2014

The Potential Consequences of Seeking an "Early Divorce"

"I just want to be done with it," is often the first thing I will hear from prospective and current divorce clients. Typically, they want to know how soon they can get divorced. Maybe they feel that something magical will happen when they utter those anticipated words, "I am single again." Perhaps they have a partner whom they have promised to marry as soon as they legally can, or maybe they are seeking rapid closure—perhaps to buy a home, move out of state or change careers. All of the reasons stated above have their own merits, but it is equally important that the eager to be single person consider what the court will require to give you your early divorce. By “early divorce” I am referring to a divorce in advance of the parties resolving all remaining issues in their divorce.

By way of background information, typically the earliest one can even be eligible to be divorced is six months after the other side, the party served with the divorce papers, has acknowledged service of process (assuming they have timely done so and are not in default or subject to a potential default judgment). The problem is that some people believe that once they are legally divorced that they do not have any obligations to their ex-spouse, other than the child and/or spousal support obligations. This is not necessarily true. There are many things that the court will require you to maintain in place if you are the party seeking the early bifurcation (that is, divorce and restoration of single status), particularly if you are the bread winner or higher wage earner.

One common issue arises with regard to maintaining medical insurance for your spouse, who without your coverage, would be left with no medical insurance. The issue arises because once you are divorced and single status restored, most medical insurance plans, that is, the typical group health care plan, will not allow you to continue to cover someone to whom you are not legally married. So the early divorce seeker will be required to do something about this problem. Moreover, your soon to be ex-spouse will not be too eager to agree to an early bifurcation of marriage because of the insurance issue (or various other reasons for that matter), which puts you in the position of having to bring a Motion for Bifurcation of Marriage hearing, where each side makes his and her case.

Experienced practitioners opposing you will want some sort of assurance that their client will continue to be covered for medical insurance to give you your bifurcation. They may want you to provide a private plan (which is expensive) or finance COBRA (which allows your soon to be ex-spouse to stay on your group health care plan for a limited period of time while he or she explores private insurance). Generally speaking, both options are more expensive than simply allowing your ex-spouse to remain on the policy of group health care. Family Code Section 2337 requires that the insurance issue be addressed and maintained as a precondition for bifurcation.

There are a host of other concerns and ramifications to seeking an early divorce. While none of them alone should dissuade someone motivated from getting an early divorce from so doing, the issues are certainly something that you should discuss with your attorney so that you can make an informed decision. Your lawyer will know that you just want to be done with it, but there are always degrees of done, and unlike a good steak, in this instance it is better to be, pardon the expression, “well done.” 

If you have questions about seeking an early divorce, or the consequences of doing so, contact the Law Offices of Dabbah & Haddad, APC

No comments:

Post a Comment